Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
- B. Shraddha
- S. Raghavendra
- P. Nikita
- S. Ajit
- Preeti Pillai
- Shivashankar Huddar
- Prashant Achari
- Sanjay Eligar
- Uma Mudenagudi
- A. B. Raju
- Arun Giriyapur
- B. B. Kotturshettar
- Nitin Kulkarni
- Ashok Shettar
- Shivaprasad Mukhandmath
- Rajashekhar Savadi
- Gopalkrishna Joshi
- Ujwala Patil
- Suneeta Budihal
- Ramesh Ashok Tabib
- M. Shruti
- C. Satish
- Minal Salunke
- Bhagyashree Kinnal
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Iyer, Nalini
- Tutorial: A Case Study on Integrated Learning
Abstract Views :144 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department Of Instrumentation Technology, B. V. Bhoomaraddi College of Engineering and Technology, Hubli, Karnataka, IN
1 Department Of Instrumentation Technology, B. V. Bhoomaraddi College of Engineering and Technology, Hubli, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 28, No Spl Iss (2015), Pagination: 223-227Abstract
Today's world has graduated engineers in large number with good knowledge of fundamental engineering science but engineers lacks ability to apply that in practice with real time problems. One major reason for this may be that our students are exam oriented. Our emphasis must be on "what is learnt" rather than "what is taught" in class. Faculty should transform themselves from teacher to facilitator. Conventional transform focuses much on engineering science and technical courses without providing sufficient integration between these two. As observed, students study different courses as black box without interconnection between them. This paper presents a learning method that effectively integrates Circuit analysis with Signals and Systems Course. Integrated learning motivates the students to put together the knowledge of the different courses studied previously or in the same semester and apply them in real time problems through integrated tutorials. This learning method facilitates 100% involvement of students in group; help them changing their approach towards learning the course and enabling them to understand the importance and application of what they are learning catering to large class room. Findings shows that there was a significant positive difference in students academic achievement and attitude towards learning the subject through this pedagogical activity.Keywords
Integrated Tutorial, ABET.- Digital Signal Processing: An Abstract Mathematics to Real World Experience
Abstract Views :162 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Instrumentation Technology, B.V. Bhoomaraddi College of Engineering & Technology, Hubli, Karnataka, IN
1 Department of Instrumentation Technology, B.V. Bhoomaraddi College of Engineering & Technology, Hubli, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 29, No Spl Iss (2016), Pagination:Abstract
Teaching large classroom is always a very challenging task for educators. This is due to many difficulties imposed on the teaching-learning process. Digital signal processing (DSP) is now pervasive as it is used in everything from digital photo cameras, MP3 players to automobiles. However many students see DSP as abstract mathematics. This is because of the gap between understanding the mathematical formalism of each concept and being able to make sense of them in practice. Getting students actively participate in learning process and motivating them to fill these gaps is a difficult task [3]. To address this difficulty a "recipe" is suggested i.e. "visualizing" the DSP theory with practical applications like speech processing, image processing and so on will help the students in learning better. Sensory stimulation theory of learning says that majority of knowledge held by adults is through seeing (75%) while hearing is the next (13%) and if multi-senses are stimulated; greater learning because of synergy takes place. This theory encouraged us to develop undergraduate level course activity with the applications of audio processing. In this way students are able to see the results of audio processing in MATLAB plots and analyze the results by varying few design parameters. Thus DSP related theoretical concepts will be studied not just as mathematical abstracts but as a useful tools having sense in real world.Keywords
Signal Processing, Filters, Order, ABET, Program outcomes, SEE.- Enhancement of Multidisciplinary PDR Course
Abstract Views :173 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Shivashankar Huddar
1,
Prashant Achari
1,
Sanjay Eligar
1,
Uma Mudenagudi
1,
Nalini Iyer
1,
A. B. Raju
1,
Arun Giriyapur
1,
B. B. Kotturshettar
1,
Nitin Kulkarni
1,
Ashok Shettar
1
Affiliations
1 B.V. B College Of Engineering And Technology, Hubli, Karnataka 580031, IN
1 B.V. B College Of Engineering And Technology, Hubli, Karnataka 580031, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 28, No 2&3 (2015), Pagination: 62-68Abstract
This paper discusses enhancement in development of project-based 'product design and realization (PDR)' course for undergraduate students. The course offered at an early stage of the curriculum is aimed at providing engineering design and product realization skills to the students. Creating an appropriate learning experience in product design is challenging owing to its multidisciplinary nature. An innovative multidisciplinary design-to-realization approach is adopted in this course and student teams are required to design and build working prototypes for predefi ned products. This course brings a new perspective to the multidisciplinary approach to teaching product design. Introduction of project based design experience at an early level provides students with an opportunity to develop capabilities to design complex systems in the future. PDR (a 3 credit course) introduced to electrical and mechanical sciences students (EC, EE, IT, IP, A&R, ME) at fourth semester (2nd year) level of engineering in BVBCET, Hubli. The implementation of course is analyzed with respect to attainment of the outcomes (ABET a-k). Also to illustrate the success of the course, the work of students in the form of Product at the end of course is included in results for validation.Keywords
Design, Electrical and Mechanical Sciences, Outcomes (ABETa-k).- An Experience of Teaching Engineering Design for Freshman Students
Abstract Views :194 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Shivaprasad Mukhandmath
1,
Shivashankar Huddar
2,
Rajashekhar Savadi
1,
Gopalkrishna Joshi
3,
B. B. Kotturshettar
1,
Nalini Iyer
2,
Ashok Shettar
4
Affiliations
1 School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
2 School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
3 Centre for Engineering Education & Research (CEER), KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
4 KLE Technological University, Hubballi, 580031, Karnataka, IN
1 School of Mechanical Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
2 School of Electronics and Communication Engineering, KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
3 Centre for Engineering Education & Research (CEER), KLE Technological University, Hubballi - 580031, Karnataka, IN
4 KLE Technological University, Hubballi, 580031, Karnataka, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 33, No SP 1 (2019), Pagination: 43-48Abstract
In recent years design thinking has taken center stage in the engineering curriculum. The driving force being the society and industries who need graduate engineers who can design, innovative, and creative products to help solve the real-world problems. The current paper discusses the experiences of a systematic approach in defining, teaching, and assessing the engineering design process to freshman engineering students at KLE Technological University (KLETU). The paper begins by defining 'design thinking' followed by briefly reviewing the role of engineering design and its importance in the engineering curriculum. Design is hard to learn but hardest to teach. Efforts have been made, in this work, to bring in the perspective of the pedagogy of activity-based teaching and its challenges and opportunities in teaching engineering design process at the freshman engineering level. This pedagogical approach, for freshman level, resulted in enhanced students learning.Keywords
Design, Freshman Engineering, Activity, Learning.References
- Mourtos NJ. Defining, teaching, and assessing engineering design skills. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education (IJQAETE) 2012; 2(1): 14–30.
- McDonald WM, Brogan DS, and Lohani VK et al., Developing a first-year engineering course at a university in India: international engineering education collaboration.
- Ambrose SA and Amon CH. Systematic Design of a FirstYear Mechanical Engineering Course at Carnegie Mellon University. Journal of Engineering Education; 86(2): 173– 181. URL 10.1002/j.2168-9830.1997.tb00281.x.
- Genco N, Hölttä-Otto K, and Seepersad CC. An experimental investigation of the innovation capabilities of undergraduate engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education 2012; 101(1): 60–81.
- Julie D. Burton and Daniel M. White, Selecting a Model for Freshman Engineering Design, Journal of Engineering Education, 1999, 88(3), 327-332
- Payton LN. Design for manufacturing excellence (DFMX) begins at the freshman level. Journal of manufacturing systems 2005; 24(3): 178.
- Khalaf K, Balawi S, Hitt GW et al. Engineering Design Education: When, What, and How. Advances in Engineering Education 2013; 3(3): n3.
- Sanjay E, Sachin A, Uma M et al. Engineering Design: A Sophomore Course for Undergraduates in Electrical Sciences. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 2015; 196–201.
- Patil AY, Shivaprasad M, and Kodancha KG. Infusing Design Techniques-An Integrated Approach. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations 2016.
- Dym CL and Little P. Engineering design: a project-based approach (2000).
- Hubka V and Eder WE. Pedagogics of design education. International Journal of Engineering Education 2003; 19(6): 799–809.
- Stojcevski A. Learning to solve ‘design problems’ in engineering education. Washington Accord http://www.ieagreements.org/assets/Uploads/Documents/Hitory/25YearsWashingtonAccord-A5booklet-FINAL pdf 2014.
- A Step Towards Introducing Data Analytics and Visualization for Students of Electrical Sciences: An Initiative Through Machine Learning Course
Abstract Views :228 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Uma Mudenagudi
1,
Ujwala Patil
1,
Suneeta Budihal
1,
Ramesh Ashok Tabib
1,
M. Shruti
1,
C. Satish
1,
Nalini Iyer
1,
Ashok Shettar
1
Affiliations
1 KLE Technological University, Vidyanagar, Hubballi - 580031, IN
1 KLE Technological University, Vidyanagar, Hubballi - 580031, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 33, No 2 (2019), Pagination: 34-40Abstract
In this paper, we share our experience of introducing data analytics and visualization for students of electrical sciences through Machine Learning course. Typically, electrical science students face challenges in handling and visualizing huge data and its analysis as there is a limited scope in the curriculum. During the discussion with research and development centers of different industries and institutes we found the gap in curriculum, and towards this, we designed the Machine Learning course to introduce data analytics and visualization, and state of art machine learning tool for students of electrical sciences. The course is designed with different levels of exercises and activities to support their learning. Exercises were designed to support conceptual learning and were extended as activities towards solving a given problem. The course project was designed as an extended activity considering problems from online challenges and contests/hackathon towards enhancing their learning beyond the curriculum. The outcome of the course was motivating as industry people appreciated the learning through evaluation.Keywords
Machine Learning, Visualization, Hackathon, Activities, Online Challenges.References
- Ignacio de los Ríosa, Adolfo Cazorlaa, José M. Díaz-Puentea, José L. Yagüea, “Project–based learning in engineering higher education: two decades of teaching competences in real environments”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · December 2010.
- Dannyela da Cunha Lemos, Silvio Antonio FerrazCario, University–industry interaction in Santa Catarina: evolutionary phases, forms of interaction, benefits, and barriers, D.C. Lemos, S.A. Cario / RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação 14 (2017) 16–29.
- David Cobham, Carl Gowen, Bruce Hargrave, Kevin Jacques, Jack Laurel, Scott Ringham, “From Hackathon To Student Enterprise: An Evaluation Of Creating Successful And Sustainable Student Entrepreneurial Activity Initiated By A University Hackathon”.
- John Duhring,“ PROJECT-BASED LEARNING KICKSTART TIPS: Hackathon Pedagogies As Educational Technology”, NCIIA 2014.
- Ujwala B. Patil, Suneeta V. Budihal, Saroja V. Siddamal, “Activity based teaching learning: an experience, ” 3rd International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education ICTIEE 2016, ISBN 979-81-422-1830-8. January 8th to 12th COE, Pune. Published in JEET.
- Report of The Course Evaluation Project Team, November 7, 2016.
- Prof. Claudio Dell' Era, Prof. ssa Elena Pellizzoni, “Hackathon as Emerging Innovation Practice: Exploring Opportunities and Challenges through 8 in-depth Case Studies”.
- Bhavya Lal, Task Leader, “Strategies for Evaluating Engineering Education Research”, IDA Science and Technology Policy Institute.
- Siva Chandrasekaran, Alex Stojcevski, Guy Littlefair, Matthew Joordens, “Learning through Projects in Engineering Education”, SEFI, 40th annual conference, 23-16 September 2012, Thessaloniki, Greece.
- Dr. Aruna Shekar, Massey University, “Project based Learning in Engineering Design Education: Sharing Best Practices”, 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, June 15-18, 2014
- Garg V. Varma "Case Studies: The Potential Teaching Instruments for Software Engineering Education" Proc. 5th Int. Conf. Soft. Quality pp. 279-284 2005.
- Wohlin B. Regnell "Achieving Industrial Relevance in Software Engineering Education" Proc. 12th IEEE Conf. Soft. Eng. Educ. & Training pp. 16-25 1999.
- K. Beckman N. Coulter S. Khajenoori N. Mead "Collaborations: Closing the IndustryAcademic Gap" IEEE Software vol. 14 no. 6 pp. 49-57 1997.
- K. J. McDermott J. Machotka "Enhancing final year project work in engineering programmes" UICEE 2006.
- Hudson P. Harding "Improving project work on degree courses" Engineering Education 2002: Professional Engineering Scenarios (Ref. No. 2002/056) IEE vol. 1 pp. 17-17 2002.
- Raucent "What kind of project in the basic year of an engineering curriculum" Journal of Engineering Design vol. 15 pp. 107-121 2004.
- Imazawa N. Naoe M. Ito "Learning through Experience-Hands-on education at a technical college in Japan-" proceedings 2014 IEEE International Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED 2014) 2014.
- Redesign of Digital Circuits Course for Enhanced Learning
Abstract Views :146 |
PDF Views:2
Authors
Affiliations
1 School of ECE, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, IN
2 Department of ENE, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, IN
1 School of ECE, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, IN
2 Department of ENE, KLE Technological University, Hubballi, IN
Source
Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, Vol 35, No 4 (2022), Pagination: 163-170Abstract
The paper presents the restructuring of course design and delivery, to attain the enhanced learning in Digital Circuits course through pedagogic practices and hands on experience in laboratory. The objective of the paper is to enhance the understanding of the course beyond the class room teaching. The traditional approach of course design, course delivery and course assessment provide less scope for better learning of courses. To address the limitations of traditional approaches, an Outcome Based Education (OBE) proposes many pedagogical practices. The paper proposes a framework to restructure the Digital Circuits course w.r.t.. to content delivery in the class, course projects and the reframing the laboratory experiments. The contents delivery is supported by expert lecture through videos, course project is aided by concept/prototype development and the lab is formulated to exercise multiple problems on a single topic. The students' attainment is measured and analyzed through examination results and feedback. The technical and professional outcomes are achieved through the proposed framework.Keywords
Digital Circuits, Alternate Design, OBE, Course Design, Course Project, Simulation.References
- Roy Jackson, Jessica Karp, Ellen Patrick and Amanda Thrower, “Social Constructivism”, 2006, Vignette.
- John A. Centra, “Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing Teaching and Determining Faculty Effectiveness”, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993, 244 pp.
- Sopiah Abdullah and Adilah Shariff, “The effects of inquiry-based computer simulation with cooperative learning on scientific thinking and conceptual understanding of gas laws”, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2008, Vol 4, Issue 4, pp.387-398.
- Alexandros Papadimitriou, “An Innovative Approach in Teaching Digital Electronics at Technical High Schools”, Inernational Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, ISSN 2250-2459, Vol 2, Issue 9, September 2012.
- Siddamal S.V. et al. (2015) Enhanced Learning Through Self-Study Component in Engineering Education. In: Natarajan R. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Transformations in Engineering Education. Springer, New Delhi. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1931-6-53.
- Kahane H, (1989). “The proper subject matter for critical thinking courses. Argumentation, Vol 3, Issue 2, May 1989, pp 141–147.
- Salomon G, “Technology and education in the information age”, Tel Aviv: Haifa University, Zemora- Bitan Publishers, 2000.
- Resnick M, “Rethinking learning in the digital age”, InG. Kirkman (Ed.), The global information technology report 2001-2002, Readiness for the networked world, Oxford University Press, pp.32-37, New York.
- Patil Ujwala, Suneeta V. Budihal, Saroja V. Siddamal, and Uma K. Mudenagudi. "Activity Based Teaching Learning: An Experience." Journal of Engineering Education Transformations (2016).
- Thomas T, Davis T, and Kazlauskas K, “Embedding critical thinking in an IS curriculum”, Journal of Information Technology Education, Vol 6, 2007, pp. 327-346.
- Stephen Black,and Ellis R, “Evaluating the level of critical thinking in introductory investments courses”, Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 2010, Vol 14, Issue 4, pp.99-106.
- Forrester J, “Thinking Creatively; Thinking Critically”, Asian Social Science, Vol 4, No.5, May 2008pp.100- 105.
- Peter A. Facione, Noreen C. Facione, and Carol A. Giancarlo, “The disposition toward critical thinking: Its character, measurement, and relation to critical thinking skill”, Informal Logic, Vol 20, No 1, 2000, pp. 61-84.
- Saroja V. Siddamal, et.al., Reflective teaching for undergraduate courses: an experience, DOI: 10.16920/jeet/2017/v0i0/111749.
- Andrea A. DiSessa, “Changing Minds: Computers, Learning, and Literacy”, Cambridge, MIT Press, 2001- Computers - 271 pages.
- Barak Rosenshine and Carla Meister, “The use of scaffolds for teaching higher level cognitive strategies”, Educational Leadership, 1992, pp.26- 33.
- L S Vygotsky, “Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes”, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1978.
- Priya Sharma, and Michael Hannafin, “Scaffolding critical thinking in an online course: An exploratory study”, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol 31, Issue 2, 2004, pp.181-208. M M Lombardi, “Authentic Learning for the 21st Century: An Overview”, Series on Authentic Learning, Educauce learning Initiative (ELI), 2007.